The "Green New Deal" - Another Means By Which To Steal Human Rights (Revised)
The Green New Deal is not to save the environment. It is a vehicle to install a one-party government and steal your human rights in the process.
The Inconvenient Facts
Of course, you will never hear any mention of toxic waste or the environmental devastation connected to the "Green New Deal." The mainstream media and the Marxist politicians cannot have you know the following.
How much carbon-based energy and materials does it require to build wind turbines?
"Material requirements of a modern wind turbine have been reviewed by the United States Geological Survey. On average 1 MW of wind capacity requires 103 tonnes of stainless steel, 402 tonnes of concrete, 6.8 tonnes of fiberglass, 3 tonnes of copper and 20 tonnes of cast iron".
If the life expectancy of a solar panel is 7 - 20 years and can't be recycled, what do you do with the used ones? We would be remiss not to mention that they are manufactured with toxic metals as well. What would that do to the environment?
"About 7.86 billion solar panels would be needed to power the U.S. on solar energy. This is derived from the fact that every year the U. S. consumes around 4000 billion kWh of electricity. This means an astounding consumption of 12,000 kWh per year per capita".
If the media reported the facts, the public would almost immediately reject this blueprint.
The Green New Deal Is Only A Political Tool
With the "orange man bad" narrative gone, the Marxists immediately switched the misrepresentation to "police brutality." The Marxists would have to invent yet another narrative for assisting in their global domination if the Green New Deal fails.
Please see the failed Covid-19 pandemic scheme with a 99.8% survival rate.
The Marxists need multiple crises to support their political agenda to exact the change they want.
They will continue to invent crises until they achieve globalist one-party rule. We are very interested to see what emergencies they will manufacture next in their quest for total control.
AOC And Thunberg Are Marxist Puppets
Greta Thunberg and AOC are the two most recognizable faces of the Marxist climate change movement. Thunberg for a "climate emergency" (problem) and AOC for the Green New Deal response to it (solution).
Both women lack the general capacity needed to spearhead a political movement. We know them to be fake because they are too unintelligent to access even the most basic information.
You could see an un-prepared Thunberg delivering a terrible speech to The European Parliament in 2019. Her handlers propped her up and rolled her out un-rehearsed. Indeed this embarrassment most likely exacted some mental damage to the then 16-year-old girl.
Her parents later claimed that their daughter suffers from multiple mental problems. Marxists always run to victimhood whenever they are exposed.
Congress invited Thunberg to testify on Earth Day. When asked the simple question of how many parts per million their CO2 level goal is, she could not answer.
If you acquire your notoriety through "environmental change" and by reducing CO2, shouldn't you know the most basic facts about the subject? She is a coached person who represents this massive change in how we live our lives.
AOC could not figure out what a garbage disposal does and posts it to Instagram. A more intelligent person would have Googled that beforehand if they could not understand what the device does.
She lied about being in the Capitol Building on January 6. And like Thunberg, she claimed victimhood and stated she was sexually assaulted when confronted with the lie. We still don't understand what one has to do with the other.
More recently, when addressing the border crisis issue, she claimed: "It isn't a surge because it has nothing to do with "insurgency."
And, we should not forget about the shameful "cow farts" manifesto.
The enormous lack of intelligence on both their part proves that they are a recruited façade. Unfortunately, the Marxists do not need scientists to promote their propaganda.
Propaganda Defined
From the Marxist playbook via Nazi, Joseph Goebbels
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State." - Joseph Goebbels
The 97% Lie
Almost to a person, the fabrication that "97%" of scientists believe humans cause climate change" is recited repeatedly by the Marxists. It is a blatant lie. But, that is how propaganda is developed and spread.
The proof:
From Scientific American:
"The point of contention is a peer-reviewed study published last year by Green, a chemistry professor at Michigan Technological University; John Cook, a research fellow at the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland in Australia; and 10 other scientists who blog under the collective name of Skeptical Science. The scientists examined 4,014 abstracts on climate change and found 97.2 percent of the papers assumed humans play a role in global warming (ClimateWire, May 16, 2013).
That statement quickly got boiled down in the popular media to a much simpler message: that 97 percent of scientists believe climate change is caused by humans. President Obama tweeted the 97 percent consensus. Comedian John Oliver did a segment on it that went viral on the Internet".
Of course, 97% was the percentage of abstracts studied, not 97% of all scientists.
The Truth About CO2 And The "Climate Crisis"
There was an irretrievable YouTube video on "climate change," most likely censored. Two scientists detail how the entire "climate change" fiasco is that, a fiasco.
They argued against CO2 as a factor in any "climate change" because of the measurably small amount in the atmosphere. It's difficult not to agree with them.
The Marxists can't speak about the numbers below. They want you to believe that if we do not change the way we live, the world as we know it will end.
Of course, that change must be one-party rule because only they can solve this problem.
The Numbers
According to NASA:
There are 411 parts of Carbon Dioxide for every million parts of air.
According to the Department of Earth & Climate Sciences - San Francisco State University
CO2 accounts for .036% of the entire atmosphere.
According to Live Science:
"In order to restore a healthy climate, society should set a goal of reducing CO2 to levels less than 300 PPM by 2050."
If you do the simple math, one would have to believe that by reducing carbon emissions by 28% (411 PPM to 300 PPM), we can save the world by 2050.
There are a few issues with these numbers.
The math tells us that reducing 111 PPM of CO2 would only be a tiny .000111% change to the entire atmosphere.
.000111 is one ten thousandths.
Of course, this will cost trillions upon trillions of dollars. Job losses will be in the millions, and skyrocketing government dependency grows. But, the Earth cools, and we survive, according to the Marxists.
And yes, changing anything one-tenth of one percent is very close to no noticeable change whatsoever.
We're not saying that there is no climate change. Of course, the climate changes. If it didn't, we wouldn't have had the "mid-evil warming period" or the "little ice age."
We are saying that climate change is not due to 111 PPM of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Should anyone sacrifice for a .000111% change of anything? We hope not, but that is what the Marxists are asking us to do.
Real-Life Application Of "Climate Change" Tyranny
They shuttered the Keystone XL Pipeline via executive order. We have seen both gas prices and inflation soar. And, we have witnessed the opening up of our southern border to cultivate a new political class.
If some of you believe that these actions may not affect you and your family too much, you may be able to live with the ramifications. For the rest of you, we present the following:
From Breitbart.com
Report: 'Unsustainable' Suburban America Contributes to Climate Change
"And now a report from the left-leaning Brooking Institute is claiming that the "unsustainable" nature of the suburbs means they must be transformed in the name of preventing climate change."
"Brookings, citing a New York Times report, said reaching Biden's climate change goals with require "systems-level changes across every sector of the economy."
"The Brookings report claims that low-density neighborhoods "require more physical capital per person" and manufacturing building materials such as concrete, asphalt, and piping adds to climate change."
"The report says that "car-dependent development" and zoning that doesn't allow high-density housing "incentivizes less energy efficient building designs."
"This includes single family homes, which "miss out on the energy efficiencies of shared walls."
The Measured Response - Nothing
The numbers are correct. The assumptions, narrative, fabrications, and propaganda pushed on an entire population are not. To achieve a particularly diabolical political goal using a "climate crisis" is evil.
So, what then is our response to this manufactured "climate crisis?" Because according to rocket scientist AOC over two years ago:
"The world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address climate change"!
The response should be the same that the Marxist Democrats have to BLM and Antifa burning down our cities. Nothing.
Why would anyone, regardless of their political leanings, believe these people? They produce countless lies for political purposes, not environmental ones.
The research to find the truth is in everyone's hands. Surprisingly, there are propagandized people who do believe the lies. And to them, it feels good to sacrifice their freedom and rights for a little CO2.
Frankie S.